Subject: Before & After photos SHOCK Skincare community (13)
Sender name: Purehealth Research (8)
Sender email: [email protected] (4)
Received from ip: 192.236.232.97 (6)
Received from host name: lima.purehelth.best (6)
Before & After photos SHOCK Skincare community http://purehelth.best/Ek704YOKJMsq7s-LE7EC_q4KOmPYvVi8Cd0XA5aeMlYpwA http://purehelth.best/LyFWQH7tt2EIn7ubCUgTr8oTBw8zyR8EAQzwmWd5ePp9fw Evidence of its existence was first found near the Smoky Hill River in Kansas, United States in the form of partial skull fragments and as an articulated postcranial skeleton. Originally named Hadrosaurus agilis (Marsh, 1872), it was placed in a new genus and renamed Claosaurus agilis in 1890 when major differences between this specimen and Hadrosaurus came to light. In 1892, Marsh named a second species, C. annectens. This species later was reassigned to Anatosaurus and then Edmontosaurus, where it is currently. G. R. Wieland named third species C. affinis in 1903, which he compared to C. annectens. C. affinis was founded on remains from the Pierre Shale of South Dakota, found in association with remains of the giant sea turtle Archelon. At some point after its description, the fragmentary remains were mixed up with the original remains of C. agilis, and a toe bone from C. agilis was accidentally thought to be the only part of the holotype remains that could be located. This was corrected by Joseph Gregory in 1948, who found three toe bones from the right foot of a large hadrosaur in the Yale collections that had comparable preservation to the Pierre Shale turtle remains and were associated with labels in Wieland's handwriting. Gregory found the toe bones to be very similar in size to the corresponding bones of Marsh's Claosaurus annectens, but did not reassign the species due to its much older age and fragmentary remains. "C. affinis" was considered a dubious hadrosaur in the 2004 review by Jack Horner and colleagues. They reported its type material as lost, although they also reported these remains as only including a single toe bone, instead of the three toe bones of Gregory. Reports of gastroliths, or stomach stones, in Claosaurus are actually based on a probable double misidentification. First, the specimen is actually of Edmontosaurus annectens. Barnum Brown, who discovered the specimen in 1900, referred to it as Claosaurus, because E. annectens was thought to be a species of Claosaurus at the time. Additionally, it is more likely that the supposed gastroliths represent gravel washed in during burial.
Return-Path: <936-187-34323-254-sales=[FILTERED]@mail.purehelth.best> X-Original-To: sales@[FILTERED] Delivered-To: [FILTERED] Received: from lima.purehelth.best (unknown [192.236.232.97]) by [FILTERED]-inbox (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B80A5BB01 for <sales@[FILTERED]>; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 13:51:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=purehelth.best; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; [email protected]; bh=94+5irRQk6E88FJCd2sfLuOYqMU=; b=Y26orIF7v5vtwpUscszzt0+YPXKF7AJnM6AF386+zyI75lFIqGU44mdTQ+WEWRHTY1c4d3vpNIYR lG/LGtkl5qh6PPEIz146a/xXctYobEQLBlO560SiMEfLRo4w6a/LGNaQyMhWjMm/sEVU/WDjDI4k DK8QUm432gChU3DTqXs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=purehelth.best; b=b+O+/91idkuhnRgi8ygBaj3WrZ/gygL7g51+erUn/0TCejqKG9nfTbYvcGKad0VxDWCCiP2dmaaI mlrNirF29olYuRfMe73VlUhLddKi7YysBi6E7llIoBHHlRgqv3iOZU5GckJMI3qLOoHjYdyWfsvq pHIsuLJs22wueqRxL0I=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="8366d2f78d393cd70f8c308185b777be_bb_8613" Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:51:32 -0400 From: "Purehealth Research" <[email protected]> Reply-To: "Purehealth Research" <[email protected]> Subject: Before & After photos SHOCK Skincare community To: <sales@[FILTERED]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> --8366d2f78d393cd70f8c308185b777be_bb_8613 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before & After photos SHOCK Skincare community http://purehelth.best/Ek704YOKJMsq7s-LE7EC_q4KOmPYvVi8Cd0XA5aeMlYpwA http://purehelth.best/LyFWQH7tt2EIn7ubCUgTr8oTBw8zyR8EAQzwmWd5ePp9fw Evidence of its existence was first found near the Smoky Hill River in Kansas, United States in the form of partial skull fragments and as an articulated postcranial skeleton. Originally named Hadrosaurus agilis (Marsh, 1872), it was placed in a new genus and renamed Claosaurus agilis in 1890 when major differences between this specimen and Hadrosaurus came to light. In 1892, Marsh named a second species, C. annectens. This species later was reassigned to Anatosaurus and then Edmontosaurus, where it is currently. G. R. Wieland named third species C. affinis in 1903, which he compared to C. annectens. C. affinis was founded on remains from the Pierre Shale of South Dakota, found in association with remains of the giant sea turtle Archelon. At some point after its description, the fragmentary remains were mixed up with the original remains of C. agilis, and a toe bone from C. agilis was accidentally thought to be the only part of the holotype remains that could be located. This was corrected by Joseph Gregory in 1948, who found three toe bones from the right foot of a large hadrosaur in the Yale collections that had comparable preservation to the Pierre Shale turtle remains and were associated with labels in Wieland's handwriting. Gregory found the toe bones to be very similar in size to the corresponding bones of Marsh's Claosaurus annectens, but did not reassign the species due to its much older age and fragmentary remains. "C. affinis" was considered a dubious hadrosaur in the 2004 review by Jack Horner and colleagues. They reported its type material as lost, although they also reported these remains as only including a single toe bone, instead of the three toe bones of Gregory. Reports of gastroliths, or stomach stones, in Claosaurus are actually based on a probable double misidentification. First, the specimen is actually of Edmontosaurus annectens. Barnum Brown, who discovered the specimen in 1900, referred to it as Claosaurus, because E. annectens was thought to be a species of Claosaurus at the time. Additionally, it is more likely that the supposed gastroliths represent gravel washed in during burial. --8366d2f78d393cd70f8c308185b777be_bb_8613 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit <html> <head> <title>Newsletter</title> </head> <body><br /> <a href="http://purehelth.best/I0J_vu-i1icEzdu6iy1WjH2nImx9EzjFn49Xmao5NRjn"><img src="http://purehelth.best/95e0e35dd7322b88ef.jpg" /><img height="1" src="http://www.purehelth.best/1GHzp_sGsmWtxyTw7ixF5pWjbA-cgOzL30_vamnUBvO3" width="1" /></a> <div style="width:500px; font-size:17px; padding:10px; text-align:left; font-family:arial;"><a href="http://purehelth.best/Ek704YOKJMsq7s-LE7EC_q4KOmPYvVi8Cd0XA5aeMlYpwA"><b>Have you seen these before & after photos?</b></a><br /> <br /> They're of a few women who have applied a new, all natural "fake facelift" formula to their face and wiped away their wrinkles in seconds!<br /> <br /> It's thanks to a new, secret ingredient that virtually nobody else is using in their skincare…<br /> <br /> <a href="http://purehelth.best/Ek704YOKJMsq7s-LE7EC_q4KOmPYvVi8Cd0XA5aeMlYpwA"><img alt="" src="http://purehelth.best/7b26f76750ced4550b.jpg" style="width:400px;" /></a><br /> <a href="http://purehelth.best/Ek704YOKJMsq7s-LE7EC_q4KOmPYvVi8Cd0XA5aeMlYpwA"><b>you can view image here</b></a><br /> <br /> Discovered by a Beverly Hills Housekeeper, this new "Fake Facelift" will reverse your visible facial age by 10-20 years.<br /> <br /> <a href="http://purehelth.best/Ek704YOKJMsq7s-LE7EC_q4KOmPYvVi8Cd0XA5aeMlYpwA"><b>See the full story in this video.</b></a><br /> <br /> This is a <a href="http://purehelth.best/Ek704YOKJMsq7s-LE7EC_q4KOmPYvVi8Cd0XA5aeMlYpwA"><b>must watch video</b></a> for ANYONE who wants more youthful skin.<br /> <br /> While the saying goes that "beauty is more than skin deep", you'll see in <a href="http://purehelth.best/Ek704YOKJMsq7s-LE7EC_q4KOmPYvVi8Cd0XA5aeMlYpwA"><b>this short video</b></a> why this new skincare discovery is changing everything!<br /> </div> <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:6px;">Evidence of its existence was first found near the Smoky Hill River in Kansas, United States in the form of partial skull fragments and as an articulated postcranial skeleton. Originally named Hadrosaurus agilis (Marsh, 1872), it was placed in a new genus and renamed Claosaurus agilis in 1890 when major differences between this specimen and Hadrosaurus came to light. In 1892, Marsh named a second species, C. annectens. This species later was reassigned to Anatosaurus and then Edmontosaurus, where it is currently. G. R. Wieland named third species C. affinis in 1903, which he compared to C. annectens. C. affinis was founded on remains from the Pierre Shale of South Dakota, found in association with remains of the giant sea turtle Archelon. At some point after its description, the fragmentary remains were mixed up with the original remains of C. agilis, and a toe bone from C. agilis was accidentally thought to be the only part of the holotype remains that could be located. This was corrected by Joseph Gregory in 1948, who found three toe bones from the right foot of a large hadrosaur in the Yale collections that had comparable preservation to the Pierre Shale turtle remains and were associated with labels in Wieland's handwriting. Gregory found the toe bones to be very similar in size to the corresponding bones of Marsh's Claosaurus annectens, but did not reassign the species due to its much older age and fragmentary remains. "C. affinis" was considered a dubious hadrosaur in the 2004 review by Jack Horner and colleagues. They reported its type material as lost, although they also reported these remains as only including a single toe bone, instead of the three toe bones of Gregory. Reports of gastroliths, or stomach stones, in Claosaurus are actually based on a probable double misidentification. First, the specimen is actually of Edmontosaurus annectens. Barnum Brown, who discovered the specimen in 1900, referred to it as Claosaurus, because E. annectens was thought to be a species of Claosaurus at the time. Additionally, it is more likely that the supposed gastroliths represent gravel washed in during burial. </span><br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <a href="http://purehelth.best/QBD50LCtrzGqV_YoDtn_SSNKhcgyFcLoMft5bc1A1kbK"><img src="http://purehelth.best/f54f555ec386d47d58.jpg" /></a><br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> </body> </html> --8366d2f78d393cd70f8c308185b777be_bb_8613--